<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: I am teh suck at taking pictures clearly&#8230;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.geekdomme.com/stuff/i-am-teh-suck-at-taking-pictures-clearly/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.geekdomme.com/stuff/i-am-teh-suck-at-taking-pictures-clearly/</link>
	<description>Martha Stewart in black</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 21 May 2010 03:40:22 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Laiane</title>
		<link>http://www.geekdomme.com/stuff/i-am-teh-suck-at-taking-pictures-clearly/comment-page-1/#comment-596</link>
		<dc:creator>Laiane</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Sep 2007 03:47:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.knitting.geekdomme.com/i-am-teh-suck-at-taking-pictures-clearly/wips/sweaters/#comment-596</guid>
		<description>I am teh suck at yarn pr0n myself, so I understand your frustration.  I&#039;ve found that natural light is best for pics of yarn and FO&#039;s, so all my knitting stuff gets photographed outside on my back steps.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am teh suck at yarn pr0n myself, so I understand your frustration.  I&#8217;ve found that natural light is best for pics of yarn and FO&#8217;s, so all my knitting stuff gets photographed outside on my back steps.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kristen</title>
		<link>http://www.geekdomme.com/stuff/i-am-teh-suck-at-taking-pictures-clearly/comment-page-1/#comment-593</link>
		<dc:creator>Kristen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Sep 2007 22:52:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.knitting.geekdomme.com/i-am-teh-suck-at-taking-pictures-clearly/wips/sweaters/#comment-593</guid>
		<description>There&#039;s a blur on the door behind the yarn in that first picture. The yarn is beautiful and sharp, though.

If i can&#039;t have brand-new berber carpet with really thick padding, I don&#039;t want carpet at all.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There&#8217;s a blur on the door behind the yarn in that first picture. The yarn is beautiful and sharp, though.</p>
<p>If i can&#8217;t have brand-new berber carpet with really thick padding, I don&#8217;t want carpet at all.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kim</title>
		<link>http://www.geekdomme.com/stuff/i-am-teh-suck-at-taking-pictures-clearly/comment-page-1/#comment-592</link>
		<dc:creator>kim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Sep 2007 17:40:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.knitting.geekdomme.com/i-am-teh-suck-at-taking-pictures-clearly/wips/sweaters/#comment-592</guid>
		<description>God, Thermal. Seriously. I&#039;m on the back section and &quot;zzzzzzz.&quot;

For sexful blur, I found this link: http://digital-photography-school.com/blog/macro-photography-tips-for-compact-digital-camera-users/

Looks like it has a lot of good, technical tips in that one article (the rest of the site is great too).

Now I shall sit back and wait for sexy blur pics :D</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>God, Thermal. Seriously. I&#8217;m on the back section and &#8220;zzzzzzz.&#8221;</p>
<p>For sexful blur, I found this link: <a href="http://digital-photography-school.com/blog/macro-photography-tips-for-compact-digital-camera-users/" rel="nofollow">http://digital-photography-school.com/blog/macro-photography-tips-for-compact-digital-camera-users/</a></p>
<p>Looks like it has a lot of good, technical tips in that one article (the rest of the site is great too).</p>
<p>Now I shall sit back and wait for sexy blur pics <img src='http://www.geekdomme.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif' alt=':D' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ashley</title>
		<link>http://www.geekdomme.com/stuff/i-am-teh-suck-at-taking-pictures-clearly/comment-page-1/#comment-595</link>
		<dc:creator>Ashley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Sep 2007 17:03:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.knitting.geekdomme.com/i-am-teh-suck-at-taking-pictures-clearly/wips/sweaters/#comment-595</guid>
		<description>Psh.. your photos are still better than mine.  LOL.  My main problem is that I have no where to put yarn to take pictures of it that also has decent lighting.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Psh.. your photos are still better than mine.  LOL.  My main problem is that I have no where to put yarn to take pictures of it that also has decent lighting.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex</title>
		<link>http://www.geekdomme.com/stuff/i-am-teh-suck-at-taking-pictures-clearly/comment-page-1/#comment-594</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Sep 2007 16:45:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.knitting.geekdomme.com/i-am-teh-suck-at-taking-pictures-clearly/wips/sweaters/#comment-594</guid>
		<description>Well...we&#039;re not all going to take photos like Brooklyn Tweed.  Oh well.  But you can see the blur in the first comparison, the ones with the swift behind it.  I try to do it too, but I just mess around.  My latest Icarus photo was an attempt at the &quot;sexy blur.&quot;

Wood floors, wood floors!  (I like them because they=fewer allergies.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well&#8230;we&#8217;re not all going to take photos like Brooklyn Tweed.  Oh well.  But you can see the blur in the first comparison, the ones with the swift behind it.  I try to do it too, but I just mess around.  My latest Icarus photo was an attempt at the &#8220;sexy blur.&#8221;</p>
<p>Wood floors, wood floors!  (I like them because they=fewer allergies.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.565 seconds -->

